FAQ: Family Law

FAQ: Family Law in Oklahoma

From an Expert’s perspective.
I recently completed a criminal trial in which I served as an expert consultant and witness, and Mr. Cannon was the lead attorney for the defense. I was impressed with his strategy and behavior both in and outside of the courtroom. He is thoughtful, well versed in the law, and commands a presence in court. He is clearly committed to providing the best possible service to his clients.

GENERAL INFORMATION

The law does not require you have an attorney; however, you will be better prepared for every step of the process and you will understand every step in the process with a good family law attorney. Hiring an experienced family law attorney will allow you to face this difficult time with an advocate and someone always on your side to answer your questions and fight for you. Yes, a common-law marriage is formed when the parties have a meeting of the minds to consent to marriage at the same time. The following are common grounds to demonstrate common law marriage: cohabitation; acting as spouses; recognition by the community as spouses; and the parties’ declaration of being spouses. Generally, you must be eighteen years old to get married in Oklahoma; however, you may get married at sixteen years of age, if you have the consent of a parent or guardian pursuant to OKLA. STAT. tit. 43 § 3.

Yes, a marriage can be void, if attacked by annulment, while the disability exists pursuant to OKLA. STAT. tit. 43 § 128

An action to declare a marriage invalid at its creation pursuant to OKLA. STAT. tit. 43 § 128.

Automatic Temporary Injunctions (“ATIN”) are orders that automatically go into effect against both parties to a divorce or legal separation once the following two events occur: 1) filing a petition for dissolution of marriage or legal separation and 2) valid service upon the other party or their waiver of service. Automatic temporary Injunctions protect both parties to a divorce or legal separation from the other party negatively affecting assets or interests of the parties.

Automatic Temporary Injunctions (“ATIN”) restrain the parties from transferring, concealing, or disposing of any marital property, unless written consent is given, except property acted upon in the regular course of business or to retain an attorney for the divorce or legal separation or for the necessity of life. Specifically, the parties to a divorce or legal separation may not do the following upon filing of ATIN:

      • Damaging or destroying personal property of the parties or an individual party, including: electronic material, electronic communications, social networks, financial records, or anything else of value;
      • Withdrawing any funds from any retirement, pension, or other benefit plan;
      • Withdrawing or borrowing from a life insurance account of the parties or their children;
      • Changing life insurance benefits, health insurance, or automobile plans;
      • Opening or diverting the other party’s mail;
      • Signing for the other party without their consent;
      • Change or cancel health insurance, life insurance, or property insurance or fail to make claims for any of these benefits;
      • Disturb the peace of the other party or children;
      • Withdrawing one or all of the party’s children from their daycare, school, or educational facility;
      • Hiding or secreting children from the other party;
      • Removing the party’s children from the state of Oklahoma for more than two (2) weeks without the prior written consent of the other party;
      • Deny the production of necessary papers, such as tax documents, health insurance coverage information, debts, child care information, and other records.

In addition to the Automatic Temporary Injunctions of the Court either party may seek Temporary Orders of the Court after a petition for dissolution of marriage has been filed pursuant to OKLA. STAT. tit. 43 § 110(B). Temporary Orders requested of the court may address:

      • Child custody, child support, or child visitation;
      • Spousal maintenance or spousal support;
      • The payment of marital debts or payments;
      • Possession of personal and/or marital property;
      • Requests for attorney fees; and
      • Other injunction relief

Applications for Temporary Orders in divorce and legal separation cases must state a factual basis for the application, be verified by the party, and state the relief sought.

Yes, either party may seek to change or remove a temporary order or a specific automatic temporary injunction upon that party or their family law attorney showing facts necessary for removal or modification of an order.

DIVORCE

Sometimes called alimony without divorce, legal separation is the continuation of marriage with economic separation of the parties, including property division and support alimony. It can be granted for any reason, just as a divorce. The authority for legal separation is found at OKLA. STAT. tit. 43 § 108.

You can remarry your former spouse at any time; however, you must wait six (6) months to marry someone other than your former spouse. A marriage entered into prior to six (6) months after divorce is voidable and can be terminated. Additionally, if you marry someone other than your former spouse within six (6) months outside of Oklahoma and return the marriage will be valid pursuant to the Court’s decision in Copeland v. Stone, 842 P.2d 754.

No grounds are required to get a divorce in Oklahoma. We are the second state to grant no-fault divorce, which began in 1953.

Fault grounds consist of adultery, extreme cruelty, gross neglect of duty, impotence, fraud, and drunkenness pursuant to OKLA. STAT. tit. 43 § 101.

One of the parties of the divorce must have lived in Oklahoma for six (6) months in good faith prior to filing a petition for divorce, in order for the court to exercise jurisdiction, authority, over a divorce in Oklahoma. OKLA. STAT. tit. 43 §102 specifically states:

Except as otherwise provided by subsection B of this section, the petitioner or the respondent in an action for divorce or annulment of a marriage must have been an actual resident, in good faith, of the state, for six (6) months immediately preceding the filing of the petition. B. Any person who has been a resident of any United States army post or military reservation within the State of Oklahoma, for six (6) months immediately preceding the filing of the petition, may bring action for divorce or annulment of a marriage or may be sued for divorce or annulment of a marriage.

Yes, the Full Faith and Credit Clause requires the recognition of foreign divorces in Oklahoma.

In the dissolution of marriage in Oklahoma, the divorce decree shall restore the wife her former name, if she desires; each spouse shall have their property restored to them; all marital assets or property will be divided between the spouses; reasonable alimony may be granted; the Court may set apart a portion of the marital estate for the support of the children of the marriage; and other agreements of the parties.

PROPERTY DIVISION

Property acquired during a marriage is presumptively marital property and obtained through the joint efforts of spouses. However, this rebuttable presumption may be overcome with evidence proving the gifts to one spouse or inheritance were kept substantially intact and remain separate property.

Separate property is all property not acquired from the joint efforts of marriage, including property acquired after separation, but prior to a final divorce decree.

Yes, your spouse will receive a portion of your retirement account, unless your spouse waives their marital interest in your retirement account or they receive a buyout for proportionate share.

Future retirement is divided by enter of a Qualified Domestic Relations Order (“QDRO”). The QDRO is a calculation, generally conducted by an attorney separate from your Oklahoma divorce attorney and your spouse’s Oklahoma divorce attorney, who has experience in retirement division. Your chosen Oklahoma family law attorney can assist you in determining the right attorney to handle your QDRO, retirement division.

Yes, pursuant to OKLA. STAT. tit. 43 § 121 and the Uniform Services Former Spouses’ Protection Act, 10 U.S.C. § 1408, a Court can determine military retirement as property of the military member alone or of both the military member of his/her spouse.

The Court is required to enter clear and concise written findings, including the amount given to the spouse consistent with the rank, pay grade, and time of service of the member at the date of filing the divorce petition, unless a more equitable date is determined.

Marital assets are not always split evenly in Oklahoma. Our state is an equitable distribution state, which means the marital assets should be divided fairly. Family law judges in Oklahoma use their discretion to divide marital property, unless you and your family law attorney can reach an agreement with your spouse.

ALIMONY

Support alimony in Oklahoma is a “need-based concept, with a purpose of cushioning the economic impact of the post-marriage transition and readjustment to gainful employment.” Janitz v. Janitz, 315 P.3d 410. The Court is tasked with entering a reasonable award.

In many cases alimony is determined based on agreement of the parties; however, the Court has the authority to order spousal support or alimony over the objection of one party. Generally, alimony is only ordered when one party has the ability to pay and the other parties has a need for alimony or support.

Multiple factors are considered in alimony determinations, including:

      • Demonstrated need during the post-marriage readjustment period;
      • The parties’ position in life;
      • The length of the marriage and age of the parties;
      • Each party’s earning capacity;
      • The parties’ health and financial means;
      • The standard of living of the parties;
      • Parties’ income potential;
      • The time necessary to transition to supporting oneself.

Alimony may be paid in property or cash payment, which the Court finds reasonable. It is paid in either one large lump sum or installment payments over a period of time.

Yes, a property award can be replaced by the payment of alimony. One party can maintain property and provide the appropriate amount of support to the other party to make up the value of the marital share in said property.

The Sum Certain Rule for alimony dictates that the award of support alimony must be a definite total sum. It may be set out in payments of a gross sum for installment payments or a lump sum.

Awards for alimony, support, or maintenance are not dischargeable in bankruptcy proceedings in Oklahoma.

CHILD CUSTODY

Child custody determination is defined under Oklahoma law, OKLA. STAT. tit. 43 § 551-102(3) as a judgment, decree, or other order of a court providing for the legal custody, physical custody, or visitation with respect to a child. The term includes permanent child custody, temporary child custody, and orders modifying child custody. It does not cover monetary orders, including child support orders.

Joint custody is the sharing by parents in all or some of the physical care, legal care, custody, and control of their children, which is governed by OKLA. STAT. tit. 43 § 109.

Yes, the Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction Act (“UCCJA”) applies in all custody proceedings. It is the policy of Oklahoma to ensure “frequent and continuing contact with parents who have shown the ability to act in the best interests of their children and to encourage parents to share in the rights and responsibilities of rearing their children,” OKLA. STAT. tit. 43 § 110.1. Further, as long as abuse, harassment, or stalking are not part of the parental relationship there is a presumption in all custody matters that at the temporary order stage both parents should be provided equal access to their children.

No, Oklahoma law mandates at OKLA. STAT. tit. 43 § 112(C)(2) that “there shall be neither a legal preference nor a presumption for or against joint legal custody, joint physical custody, or sole custody

Absolutely not, Oklahoma law prohibits a preference for the custodial parent based on gender pursuant to OKLA. STAT. tit. 43 § 110(C)(3)(a).

Primary jurisdiction rests with the child’s home state. Oklahoma law defines a child’s home state as a state the child has lived with a parent or guardian for at least six (6) consecutive months immediately preceding the child custody case being filed, pursuant to OKLA. STAT. tit. 43 § 551-102(7).

The home state of the child has exclusive jurisdiction, authority, to hear custody under Oklahoma law.

Oklahoma uses the significant connection test, which requires substantial evidence concerning the child’s care, protection, training, and personal relationship pursuant to the Oklahoma Court of Civil Appeals case of Wood v. Redwine, 33 P.3d 53. The determination examines the past, present, and future care of the child.

The Court may grant the care, custody, and control of a child to either parent or to the parents jointly, including sole custody, joint custody, or any of multiple variations between joint custody and sole custody.

The parent seeking joint custody shall file their plan for the exercise of joint custody of their child with the Court. Each party may submit separate plans or the parties may submit a joint plan.

Every custody plan must include the following at a minimum: the physical living arrangements of the child; the child support obligation of the parties, the medical and dental care for the child, education plan, and visitation rights of the parents. In addition to the custody plan an affidavit must be attached from each parent stating the parent agrees to abide by the plan. Both the parents’ affidavits as well as the custody plan shall be filed with the petition for divorce with the District Court.

The Court will consider the custody plan or custody plans submitted by the parents and the Court’s changes, which are deemed to be in the best interest of the child, in determining the final custody plan. The final custody plan covers the exercise of joint care, custody, and control of the child or children at issue in the divorce or custody case.

Yes, parties may agree to modify a custody plan or one party may seek a modification from the Court. The plan or modification shall be filed with the Court and shall include the specifically requested changes. However, the Court will not modify the plan unless it is in the best interest of the child.

Yes, the court may terminate a joint custody decree upon the request of one or both parents or when determined to be the best interest of the child by the Court. Additionally, joint custody is not proper when the parents are unable to cooperate in decision-making and other issues concerning children.

The Court may appoint an arbitrator to resolve a dispute as to a joint custody plan or the interpretation of a provision of a joint custody plan. Additionally, if the parents refuse to participate in arbitration the Court has the authority to terminate the joint custody decree.

The Court will consider multiple factors in deciding custody disputes when domestic violence or other harmful acts are suspected, including: the safety of the child, the well-being of the child, in addition to other factors in determining what is the best course of action.

No, the Court is allowed to consider a child’s preference, if the child is old enough; however, the child’s preference is only a factor in deciding child custody.

Yes, the Court considers the preference of a child old enough to state a preference intelligently. In 2014, the Oklahoma Court of Civil Appeal in Lowry held a twelve-year old child’s preference on which parent to live with had substantial weight as she “had formed, over a significant period of time, a thoughtful, intelligent and well-reasoned preference as delineated by Oklahoma Law.” Lowry v. Lowry, 327 P.3d 230, ¶21. In that case, the court found the reasons supporting the child’s preference as well as preference was sufficient to grant the child’s preference to live with one parent over the other.

GUARDIAN AT LITEM

A Guardian At Litem is an attorney appointed by the Court either on the Court’s motion or by agreement of the parties in a child custody matter to advocate on behalf of the child. The Guardian At Litem is designated to advocate on behalf of the best interest of the child to the Court and shall not favor one side over the other. The Guardian At Litem has a number of responsibilities to the Court, including the following:

      • Review all materials available in the case that is relevant to the best interest of the child, meet with all involved parties, including the child, parents, caregivers, and health care providers to obtain knowledge of the circumstance of the child and relate the same to the Court.
      • Advocate for the best interest of the child by attending all hearings in the case and advocating for appropriate services as determined by the Guardian At Litem.
      • Monitor and inform the court of the best interests of the child throughout the judicial proceedings.
      • Maintain confidentiality of the parties throughout the case as much as feasible.

CHILD VISITATION

Under Oklahoma law, a custodial parent has physical custody of a child more than one hundred eighty-two (182) days a year, which is more than half of a calendar year.

Under Oklahoma law, a non-custodial parent has physical custody of a child one hundred eighty-two (182) days a year or less, which is less than half of a calendar year.

Grandparents may be granted visitation rights, if the District Court finds it is in the best interest of the child for grandparents to exercise visitation and there is a showing of parental unfitness or the grandparent can show a parent is not acting in the best interest of the child and would suffer harm without the grandparent being able to exercise visitation pursuant to OKLA. STAT. tit. 43 § 109.4.

Grandparents may not obtain an order compelling visitation without consent of a custodial parent or application under the Grandparent-visitation statute, OKLA. STAT. tit. 43 § 109.4.

CHILD SUPPORT

The presumption is yes, every parent has a statutory obligation, OKLA. STAT. tit. 43 §§ 112 and 113, obligation to support his or her minor child.

The Oklahoma Child Support Guidelines are used in every child support case to determine the correct amount of child support. Further, the District Court in every divorce or custody case has an obligation and duty to determine child support.

There is a rebuttable presumption that the results of applying the Schedule of Basic Child Support Guidelines to the facts and circumstances in every child support case is the correct amount.

The Adjusted Gross Income (“AGI”) is used to calculate the total accessible income for child support purposes. AGI is set by adding social security paid to the child on account of the parent; deducting any former support alimony from the income; deducting any existing child support orders that is actual paid; and deducting debts of the parties.

Gross income includes earned and passive income from any source, but does not include Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (“TANF”); Supplemental Security Income (“SSI”); Food Stamps; or General Assistance.

Earned income for child support purposes includes: salaries, wages, tips, commissions, bonuses, severance pay, military pay, hostile fire/imminent danger pay, combat pay, and other forms of income from the military.

Passive income is a catch-all outside of earned income. It specifically includes, but is not limited to the following: dividends, pensions, rent, interest income, trust income, support from another action, annuities, social security benefits, workers’ compensation, unemployment insurance benefits, disability insurance benefits, prize money, gambling winnings, lottery winnings, and royalties.

Minimum wage paid for a forty-hour work week or income for the previous three (3) years will be imputed, whichever amount is most equitable will be used for child support calculations pursuant to OKLA. STAT. tit. 43 § 118B(4).

The base child support obligation is the support displayed in the schedule of Basic Child Support Obligations after combining the Adjusted Gross Income “AGI” of both parents and the children for whom support is calculated.

Yes, the Court is required to exclude from gross income child support made or received from other child support orders pursuant to OKLA. STAT. tit. 43 §§ 118E(2) and 188E(5).

Shared parenting time, as defined at OKLA. STAT. tit. 43 § 118E(10), sets a formula outside the standard Child Support Calculation when both parents have physical custody of the child for at least 120 overnights a year.

The Obligor in child support is the parent or person required to make child support payments.

An overnight for child support calculation purposes occurs when the child is in the physical custody of a parent for twelve (12) hours or more and the parent has incurred reasonable expenses for the care of the child.

The Parenting Time Adjustment statute replaced the long-standing Shared Parenting Adjustment statute. The new statute allows for the custodial parent, the parent having more than one hundred eighty-two (182) overnights with the child, to pay child support to the non-custodial parent. The new statute, the Parenting Time Adjustment statute, prohibits a parent with more than two hundred-five (205) overnights from paying child support.

MODIFICATION

Yes, you may seek a modification to child support, if there has been a substantial change in your income or the income of the other party in your support action or if a dependent child is no longer supported under the support order.

Yes, the Oklahoma Supreme Court’s decision of Gibbons in 1968 set the standard for modification of child custody in Oklahoma, which still remains the law. There must be a “permanent and material change in circumstances warranting a change of custody.” Gibbons v. Gibbons, 442 P.2d 482.

The Oklahoma Supreme Court held in Daniel v. Daniel, 2001 OK 117, 42 P.3d 863 that joint custody is to be terminated the court must treat its decision as if making the first determination of custody in a case in accordance with the best interest of the child. Specifically, the Court held “In a divorce action, the trial court is vested with discretion in awarding custody and visitation. Nevertheless, the best interests of the child must be a paramount consideration of the trial court when determining custody and visitation.”

Any of the terms of a custody plan can be modified by showing the change is in the best interest of the child pursuant to OKLA. STAT. tit. 43 § 109(F). Additionally, the Oklahoma Court of Civil Appeals in Coget v. Coget, 966 P.2d 816, a case concerning one parent seeking to change physical custody, the Court held “because § 109(F) controls, it was error for the trial court to apply the ‘change in circumstances’ test rather than determining the children’s best interests.” Id. at ¶12.

In order to change a custody order based on a change of circumstances the following three elements must be established: 1) a permanent, substantial and material change in circumstances; 2) the change must adversely affect the best interests of the child; and 3) the change would benefit the temporal, moral and mental welfare of the child. See Daniel v. Daniel, 42 P.3d 863.

The parent seeking to transfer a sole custody order has the burden of proof to show a “substantial change in conditions since the entry of the last custody order”. Further, the change must be detrimental to the child or adversely affect the child in order to warrant a change to the physical custody of the child.

No, a military deployment cannot be used as evidence of the “substantial, material and permanent change of circumstances” that indicates cause for a permanent modification to child custody.

No, a child does not have the authority to decide custody in Oklahoma; however, there is a rebuttable presumption that a child twelve (12) years of age or older is able to form an “intelligent preference”, which the Court shall consider in deciding custody.

Yes, the court may consider the preference of any child that Court believes to be of sufficient age to form an “intelligent preference”; however the court is not bound by the preference of the child and must decide child custody based on the best interest of the child.

PATERNITY

Paternity is legal fatherhood and a paternity suit is the process to establish the legal father to a minor child. In a marriage, the husband is legally presumed to be a child’s father born to his wife during the marriage. However, paternity must be established by an Acknowledgement of Paternity through DHS or by establishing paternity through a court action.

The mother of a child born out of wedlock has custody of the child until a Court determination of paternity.

Under Oklahoma law, fathers do not have legal rights concerning a child until a Court ordered custody determination. Meaning, signing the birth certificate and an admission of paternity is not enough to exercise your rights as a father.

A child with a legal father can receive the benefits of that relationship. Father’s with a paternity Order can assert their rights and seek child custody or the right to child visitation. Additionally, fathers can seek decision making authority over their children, i.e. the ability to participate in important decision affecting your child’s education, upbringing, and extra-curricular activities.

You can file a petitioner for paternity in the appropriate court and bring the mother of the child to court in order to seek court ordered assistance in exercising rights. The entry of a paternity order will also result in a specific schedule of child support, which will allow you to know the amount of support you must provide each month.

GUARDIANSHIP

Oklahoma law allows for the appointment of a guardian in order to protect the person or property of a minor. The guardian is tasked with taking care of the minor child and ensuring the minor child’s needs are addressed.

There are multiple reasons to establish a guardianship in Oklahoma, including: enrolling a child in school; ensuring proper care for a child: day care, medical care, medical treatment, and/or support of the child; receiving state benefits for the child and ensuring the child is supported.

There are two primary types of guardianship in Oklahoma: guardianship of a child and guardianship of a vulnerable adult.

In order to be appointed a guardian in Oklahoma you or your family law attorney must file the proper paperwork in District Court, set a hearing before the assigned family law judge; and at the hearing request your appointment as guardian for the minor child. Additionally, you must follow the statutory protocol for maintaining a guardianship.

A verified guardianship petition which states the necessary information for the family law judge to consider your guardianship and if appropriate an application for emergency guardianship.

PROTECTIVE ORDERS

A victim or a member of their household, if the individual is incompetent or a minor may seek a protective order for the following acts: domestic abuse, stalking, harassment, or rape pursuant to the Protection from Domestic Abuse Act. See OKLA. STAT. tit. 22 § 60.2

A petition for protective order may be filed in the county where the victim resides, the county where the defendant resides, or the county where the conduct leading to the petition being filed occurred.

In an emergency ex parte order is sought; the Court will hold a hearing on the same day without the respondent being present and will issue an emergency ex parte order, if the Court finds it necessary to protect the victim from immediate danger of domestic abuse, stalking, or harassment.

The Court may assess attorney fees and court costs against the petitioner that sought a protective order against you, if the Court makes specific findings that the petition was sought frivolously and no victim exists pursuant to OKLA. STAT. tit. 22 § 60.2(C)(2).

Oklahoma Statutes title 12 section 2011.1 defines a frivolous claim as knowingly being asserted in bad faith or without any rational argument based in law or facts to support the petitioner’s claim.

Yes, you may seek a protective order against the party seeking a protective order against you, if you qualify as a victim of domestic abuse, stalking, harassment, or rape and the petition is sought frivolously.

You should file a petition for protective order, if you qualify, prior to the hearing on a protective order sought against you.

Generally, the Judge assigned to hear the protective order in your case will transfer the protective order to the judge hearing your custody, divorce, or other family law case. Additionally, if you have a protective order case pending in one county and a family law, divorce, or custody matter pending in another county, the court should transfer the action pursuant OKLA. STAT. tit. 22 § 60.3(D).

You have due process rights in a protective order proceeding similar to a criminal case. Your chosen family law attorney can assist you in deciding whether or not to testify or remain silent, you may call witnesses and present evidence, you may cross examine witnesses or the petitioner, and you may raises defenses to whether or not the petitioner is a victim or qualifies for one of the grounds for a protective order: domestic abuse, harassment, stalking, or rape.

Violation of a protective order is a criminal offense in Oklahoma. You should hire an experienced criminal defense attorney, if you have been accused, arrested, or charged with violation of a protective order. The punishment for a first time violation is a misdemeanor and carries up to a year in jail and up to a $1,000 fine. Second or subsequent allegations of violating a protective order are felonies and carry up to three years in prison.

Among other things the Court may transfer custody of minor children to the petitioner during the pending protective order. The judge may require you to forfeit possession of your firearms, and your employment may be affected.

Yes, you may file a motion for expungement of a victim protective order, if the order was dismissed prior to a full hearing, the other party failed to appear for the hearing and ninety days have passed, the plaintiff is deceased, or the most common, the order has been vacated and three (3) years have passed since the order was vacated, i.e. you may seek an expungement of a final protective order three (3) years after it was dismissed/vacated.

CONTEMPT OF COURT

There are two types of contempt of court, both occur in family law proceedings: direct contempt and indirect contempt. Direct contempt is disorderly or insolent behavior during court session. Indirect contempt is willful disobedience of court process or any lawful order by the court.

The punishment for contempt in a family law, divorce, or custody proceeding may be remedial to convince or coerce the defendant to follow the court order or it may be punitive to punish the defendant for failing to comply with a court order.

Generally, if you correct the issue that was raised in the contempt action your family law attorney will be able to convince the other side to your divorce or child custody case to discuss the contempt action or convince the judge to dismiss based on your correcting the issue raised in the contempt action.

A number of defenses exists to contempt of court in family law, divorce, or custody proceedings, including, but not limited to the following: the violation was not willful, i.e. the child support or alimony payment was not made, because the party is unable to make the payment; the alleged contemptuous act is not in violation of a court order, i.e. the conduct violated an agreement between the parties, but is not part of the divorce decree, custody plan, or a temporary order of the court; the contempt may be purged by correcting the act in contempt of court, i.e. paying back child support or support alimony or returning the property agreed in a divorce decree or temporary order; the defendant is not at fault for the contempt, i.e. defendant’s inability to comply due to factors outside defendant’s control, such as a third party possessing the property that the divorce court’s temporary order required be turned over to the other party; statute of limitations has run on the act in the divorce action, which was contemptuous; or you did not receive proper notice of the contempt in your family law matter or divorce.

The court should not consider issues outside the petition or amended petition for contempt, unless the parties agree to those issues being decided at one time. The Court does not have authority to render judgment in a contempt case, even in a divorce or child custody proceeding without proper notice being provided to the defendant of a contempt action.

The CANNON & ASSOCIATES, PLLC, can help you and your family. I will Fight for Your Rights. I can be reached by calling 1(405) 657-2323 or through my Contact page. All initial consultations are free and confidential.

 

Cannon & Associates

Fierce Advocates®

For Families and Freedom

Our Client Reviews

MORE 5-STAR REVIEWS REVIEWS THAN 99% of LAWYERS IN OKLAHOMA
Google Reviews

Quote Icon

"John has shown nothing but compassion and professional guidance in my case. He truly cares about his clients and is exceptionally understanding when it comes to any case he is representing. He communicates genuinely as well as in a timely matter. If I were able to give his firm any more than 5 stars, I most definitely would. He is incredible."

- HOLLY ROSE

Quote Icon

"John Cannon is an awesome attorney. He is very professional and honest. He really cares about his clients. John always gets back to you quickly to answer any questions you have regarding your case. I highly recommend CANNON & ASSOCIATES for any legal needs you may have."

- SHARON PINKARD

Quote Icon

"John Cannon has helped me through the hardest time in my life. He helped me through my divorce and custody case. He truly cares about his clients and it made me so happy he always put my daughter first and wanted what was in her best interest as a child. He is very sharp and resourceful and he has been very attentive and responsive to my needs, John is very polite and professional and he always has a great attitude. John always took the time to go over everything and explain everything in depth. I've enjoyed working with John and his team and would recommend him to other clients."

- LEXI COYLE

Quote Icon

"I have known John for about 6 years now in his capacity as a Judge Advocate and a civilian attorney. John has a rare blend of both sharp analytical and interpersonal skills. I have seen John achieve positive outcomes for clients in complex scenarios and If you need an attorney who can do the same for you - this is your guy."

- ALAN MERRIMAN

Quote Icon

"John did a very good job. Although the outcome was not 100% what we expected(strange judgement) it was overall positive. I would, have and will continue to recommended him. Although I certainly hope to not need his services again in the capacity I hired him for I would not hesitate to call if I do. Thanks John"

- MICHAEL RICKARD

Quote Icon

"I signed up with John June 25th, July 5th I received an email that my case is in line to be DISMISSED, within a 2 week time period John made what was one of the most stressful times in my life better! Every case is different but he handled my case with care and he was extremely open in his communication throughout the whole process. I hope to never have to have a criminal attorney again but if I do I will definitely go back to John. I highly recommend him to anyone else who is needing an attorney!"

- ASHLEY

Quote Icon

"John is a highly respected attorney. Professional and compassionate. He has a wealth of knowledge, being a military officer and having served as an Assistant District Attorney, a Public Defender, and an Assistant Attorney General. He helped a friend's son who was headed down the wrong path, but through John's legal defense the young man is now a successful business owner."

- ATTORNEY COLLEAGUE

Quote Icon

"John is a very professional attorney, who is not only concerned about the welfare of his client but very attentive and considerate of the family, or other bodies that are in the face of the adversity. While working on my family members case, John took time out to take a class that would educate him on how to approach the many different types of cases tried in the court room. John proved his sincerity to the calling of his job, being an attorney. I would definitely recommend him to anyone."

- LAQUITA

Quote Icon

"Mr. Cannon went above and beyond for my wife. She was facing some pretty hard fines and prison time with the US Marshalls. Mr. Cannon fought a hard fight and got her a GREAT offer. Words cannot express how much I appreciate him and what he did for my wife. I would give 10 stars and I will be promoting him. He's that awesome. He keeps you informed, he will text or call you back, and he goes above what he is asked to do and I can reassure you"HE WILL FIGHT FOR YOU OR YOUR FAMILY MEMBER". I will continue retaining him for other things my wife is battling. High five and a great big hug to Mr. Cannon. Thank you!!! John took the reigns and provided us instant peace of mind. He was timely, respectful, transparent, very professional, honest and courteous. The service he provided was above and beyond our expectations. Can’t believe professionals like him are around. Highly highly without reservations recommend him and his team."

- TARA

Quote Icon

"John Cannon is an excellent attorney. He takes sincere interest in your needs. He maintains communication and provides all the information you might want to fully understand the legal process. He also suggests alternative resolutions to your legal needs so that you can make informed choices. I definitely recommend John."

- DUDLEY

Quote Icon

"My experience with CANNON & ASSOCIATES was absolutely amazing. I hired John Cannon two days before my rebuttal statement was due back to the Staff Judge Advocate. Within that time frame he was able to talk to my Battery and Battalion Commanders, review my evidence, and help me write a rebuttal statement that help prove my case to them, the Brigade Commander and the Post Commanding General. Cannon worked thru the night to help me get the best results for me and my family. Due to his hard work and attention to detail I am still able to continue to serve my country and progress in my military career with no adverse actions on my record. I can not thank him enough on a job well done. Cannon showed me that he was invested in my case and I highly recommend you hire him when you need someone to represent you in a legal matter."

- ZAVIEN

Quote Icon

"John Cannon assisted me through a very difficult time in my military career. He worked tirelessly with me on my case and kept me informed during the entire process. I can't say enough good things about Mr. Cannon. He's incredibly knowledgeable with regards to military justice. The outcome of my case was successful and I attribute that to Mr. Cannon's professionalism and expertise in dealing with military law. I would highly recommend Mr. Cannon to anyone with military justice or criminal defense needs."

- A FORMER CLIENT

Quote Icon

"Hands down the best lawyer. Mr.Cannon accepted my case and got on it the same day. I would give him 10 stars if I could. I really appreciate the dedication on how he handles things with a short time frame."

- CHRIS

Quote Icon

"Mr. Cannon has represented me on 2 criminal cases and one civil case over the past 4 years. He has always served me honestly, speedily and with good moral direction. John has integrity and humility. He has never belittled me or treated me in an unfair manor. I appreciate all that he has done for me and I most certainly recommend him to family, strangers and friends. I will definitely use Mr. Cannon in the future for any and all of my family's legal matters."

- CANDICE

Quote Icon

"Mr. Cannon went above and beyond for my wife. She was facing some pretty hard fines and prison time with the US Marshalls. Mr. Cannon fought a hard fight and got her a GREAT offer. Words cannot express how much I appreciate him and what he did for my wife. I would give 10 stars and I will be promoting him. He's that awesome. He keeps you informed, he will text or call you back, and he goes above what he is asked to do and I can reassure you"HE WILL FIGHT FOR YOU OR YOUR FAMILY MEMBER". I will continue retaining him for other things my wife is battling. High five and a great big hug to Mr. Cannon. Thank you!!!"

- TARA

Quote Icon

"I had a great experience with John. He is very personable and helped me a lot. I’m really grateful I found him. He made me feel confident that he was the right lawyer for my case and that he wasn’t trying to sell me but genuinely just wanted to help me. I would highly recommend John to anyone!"

- DOMINIQUE

Quote Icon

"Working with Mr. Cannon has been a real life-saving experience for me and my family. He provides the knowledge of the possibilities as soon as he can get them, then works tirelessly to ensure that any concerns or questions are addressed immediately. He has been a great asset to us not only in the face of legal troubles, but in providing a sense of security that is truly reassuring in the face of the uncertain.Mr. Cannon has been a great resource and has been very patient with me. From the start he provided a list of things to do that would help me help him with my case and since the beginning has continued to give advice or suggestions on any matter that has bothered me with my situation, large or small. He is gentle, yet realistic, and this combination really does become a rock in tumultuous times such as these.I would highly recommend Mr. Cannon to anyone who needs a vigilant and committed attorney, especially one that stands by your side until your issue is resolved. He goes above and beyond not only to work, but to care for his clients!"

- ANONYMOUS

Quote Icon

"John Cannon assisted me through a very difficult time in my military career. He worked tirelessly with me on my case and kept me informed during the entire process. I can't say enough good things about Mr. Cannon. He's incredibly knowledgeable with regards to military justice. The outcome of my case was successful and I attribute that to Mr. Cannon's professionalism and expertise in dealing with military law. I highly recommend Mr. Cannon to anyone with military justice or criminal defense needs."

- S VANZANTE